<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The SSAE 16 Reporting Standard - SOC 1 - SOC 2 - SOC 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ssae-16.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ssae-16.com</link>
	<description>Support and Guidance for SSAE16, SOC 1, SOC 2, and SOC 3 reporting standards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 04:36:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SSAE 16 vs ISAE 3402 &#8211; Part 1 by Neelesh Patil</title>
		<link>http://www.ssae-16.com/isae-3402/ssae-16-vs-isae-3402-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-639</link>
		<dc:creator>Neelesh Patil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 04:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ssae-16.com/?p=61#comment-639</guid>
		<description>ISAE 3402 framework 
SSAE 16 (Auditing Standard) will help you and your counterparts in the US compete on an international leve </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ISAE 3402 framework<br />
SSAE 16 (Auditing Standard) will help you and your counterparts in the US compete on an international leve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SSAE 16 Type I Report Background Information by SOC 1 Report &#124; SSAE 16 - Standards for Attestation Engagements No. 16 (SOC 1 Report)</title>
		<link>http://www.ssae-16.com/ssae/ssae-16-type-i-report-background-information/comment-page-1/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>SOC 1 Report &#124; SSAE 16 - Standards for Attestation Engagements No. 16 (SOC 1 Report)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 21:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ssae-16.com/?p=18#comment-350</guid>
		<description>[...] SOC1 Report is what you would have previously considered to be the standard SAS70, complete with a Type I and Type II reports, but falls under the SSAE 16 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SOC1 Report is what you would have previously considered to be the standard SAS70, complete with a Type I and Type II reports, but falls under the SSAE 16 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SSAE 16 Terminology &#8211; Criteria by Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.ssae-16.com/ssae-16-terminology/criteria/comment-page-1/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 22:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ssae-16.com/?p=71#comment-338</guid>
		<description>Could you tell me where on AICPA&#039;s website can I find those best practice criteria?  Thanks. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you tell me where on AICPA&#039;s website can I find those best practice criteria?  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SSAE 16, The New Standard by hany</title>
		<link>http://www.ssae-16.com/ssae/ssae-16-the-new-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>hany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 12:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ssae-16.com/?p=4#comment-88</guid>
		<description>Hi  
In the Major Differences between SAS70 and the new SSAE/ISAE, is it expected to see the Management of Service Organisation &#039;written assertions&#039; included somewhere in the Aduitors&#039; report? or will be just a reference to this written assertion being optained and validated by the auditor?  
 
Thanks, 
Hany  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
In the Major Differences between SAS70 and the new SSAE/ISAE, is it expected to see the Management of Service Organisation &#039;written assertions&#039; included somewhere in the Aduitors&#039; report? or will be just a reference to this written assertion being optained and validated by the auditor?  </p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Hany</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

